To Greta; What might have really happend in the Casey Anthony CasePosted July 17, 2011 by doncolecartoonsCategories: News, Truth, World for Truth Tags: "Justice With Judge Jeanine", Bill O'Reilly, Casey Anthony Tria, Casey Anthony Trial, Caylee, George Anthony, Geraldo, Legal, what really happened?
What really happened in the Casey Anthony Case? The Full Story.
(This was returned from Bill O’Reilly as Unread.)
Bill O’Reilly, you are the biggest “PINHEAD” of them all, concerning the Casey Anthony trial.No, it is not ”your job“ to educate all us “dummies” out here who don’t buy into your rants and rage, and demeaning of all the “stupid jurors.” No, it is not your job to set yourself up as prosecutor, judge and jury in this case, and hold your own TV trial. No, it is not your job to incite people to mob rage in the streets, without just cause.
Just because we do not have all the answers in this case, does not mean that someone should be executed based on some prosecutor’s conjecture (an opinion not founded on sufficient evidence; a guess; a surmise.)
If one would hold their rage and tantrums long enough to t-h-I-n-k, than (besides a mountain of other holes in the prosecutions testimonies,) one might realize that Casey had no logical motive to murder her daughter, (no baby sitting problems, or whatever) nor was there any evidence in the case that she was not a good mother, but to the contrary. There was nothing to show that Casey was in any kind of rut that would hinder her from going out and partying, finding a baby-sitter, or that she expressed to anyone that she felt tied down or burdened by her two year old daughter. The prosecutor’s theory and evidences did not hold up to logic, nor to any hard evidence, not even to any circumstantial logic. There was reasonable doubt galore! The prosecutor’s story was made-up, without any realistic evidence to back it up. Unfortunately, 2/3 of the people on the street grabbed it up hook-line-and-sinker, just because they are astonishingly judgmental, bloodthirsty, and taking no care to look at and consider the evidences. A modern day lynch mob!
What really happened in the Casey Anthony Case? The Full Story.
(This was returned from Bill O’Reilly as Unread.)
Bill O’Reilly, you are the biggest “PINHEAD” of them all, concerning the Casey Anthony trial.No, it is not ”your job“ to educate all us “dummies” out here who don’t buy into your rants and rage, and demeaning of all the “stupid jurors.” No, it is not your job to set yourself up as prosecutor, judge and jury in this case, and hold your own TV trial. No, it is not your job to incite people to mob rage in the streets, without just cause.
Just because we do not have all the answers in this case, does not mean that someone should be executed based on some prosecutor’s conjecture (an opinion not founded on sufficient evidence; a guess; a surmise.)
If one would hold their rage and tantrums long enough to t-h-I-n-k, than (besides a mountain of other holes in the prosecutions testimonies,) one might realize that Casey had no logical motive to murder her daughter, (no baby sitting problems, or whatever) nor was there any evidence in the case that she was not a good mother, but to the contrary. There was nothing to show that Casey was in any kind of rut that would hinder her from going out and partying, finding a baby-sitter, or that she expressed to anyone that she felt tied down or burdened by her two year old daughter. The prosecutor’s theory and evidences did not hold up to logic, nor to any hard evidence, not even to any circumstantial logic. There was reasonable doubt galore! The prosecutor’s story was made-up, without any realistic evidence to back it up. Unfortunately, 2/3 of the people on the street grabbed it up hook-line-and-sinker, just because they are astonishingly judgmental, bloodthirsty, and taking no care to look at and consider the evidences. A modern day lynch mob!
Now, following, is a better theory, my own, as to what might have actually happened, or could have happened. When one applies some reason, they should be able to see that all the bases are covered, from beginning to end, and for-the-life-of-me, I can’t figure out why I seem to be the only one who can see this! ? It is clear! Is it not?
The defense presentation is accurate, in that it was an accident gone bad, although the defense wisely chose to go only as far –as to best show the jury that there was reasonable doubt abound– in the story presented by the prosecution. So the question is WHY? What really happened? Why was there a need to cover up what really happened?
The story of the defense was that the child’s death was an accident gone bad, out of control, and that Casey’s father, George Anthony, proceeded to help cover it up. So, why didn’t Casey just tell the truth? Obviously, because Casey must have done something very stupid, such as using a little chloroform mixture to prompt her daughter Caley to sleep. In so doing, Casey could have caused her daughter’s death, which would be considered murder by the authorities and the courts.
The defense presentation is accurate, in that it was an accident gone bad, although the defense wisely chose to go only as far –as to best show the jury that there was reasonable doubt abound– in the story presented by the prosecution. So the question is WHY? What really happened? Why was there a need to cover up what really happened?
The story of the defense was that the child’s death was an accident gone bad, out of control, and that Casey’s father, George Anthony, proceeded to help cover it up. So, why didn’t Casey just tell the truth? Obviously, because Casey must have done something very stupid, such as using a little chloroform mixture to prompt her daughter Caley to sleep. In so doing, Casey could have caused her daughter’s death, which would be considered murder by the authorities and the courts.
Another theory, I heard a guest on the Geraldo TV show say, is that he thinks Casey had run out of gas, and went to get some gas, in a gas can, and had left Caylee in the car. Evidently, the car got too hot and Casey took longer in getting the gas than she thought she would be. That would explain about the gas can, discussed in the trial.
And I say, when Casey returned, and found Caylee dead, she panicked, placed Calee’s dead body in the trunk of the car and drove home. Casey’s father, George Anthony, found out what had happened, and then he panicked also, or went out of his head. He took Caylee, put her in a bag, and using his duck tape, disposed of her the same way the family had disposed of it’s family pets. Out of mad frenzy, he tossed the body in the swamp. (Also, I even wonder if George himself might have been the father of Caylee?)
Whatever happened, it was enough to cause George Anthony to want to commit suicide. Obviously, George Anthony, loved his grandchild very much, and must have been furious with Casey over this. However; he proceeded to help Casey cover it up. Obviously, it was not Casey who disposed of the body, –but George! All the evidence points to George as being the one who ‘took care’ of the body. Why was the body disposed of, with George’s duct tape, in the same way that George had always disposed of his family pets, with chloroform, a bag, and duct tape? The true evidence shows that the duct tape was not placed over Caylee’s mouth and nose, as contended by the prosecution. In reality, there was a piece of duct tape stuck to Caylee’s hair, not her face, that had drooped down. There was no DNA, or evidence of any facial tissue on the duct tape. Also, the body had been moved around, and poked at by the meter reader who found it, over days. There was also a piece of duct tape, on the ground further away from the body. It is obvious, that duct tape was used to dispose of Caylee’s body, not to murder her. (And even if the tape really had been used to sufficate this two year old little girl, why would the murderer leave it there, to clearly point that a murder had been commited? And would it not be easier to just use a pillow?)
Why was George, after the fact, contemplating suicide? Now, it is easy to understand the anguish that was building up inside George, according to what he himself had done, to help cover-up for Casey, while at the same time loving his grand daughter so much. (You can also observe his personal anguish, on the witness stand). Of course, now that the trial is over; people will surely be taking a closer look at George Anthony, and his part in all of this. Yes; it truly was an accident gone bad! And yes; it truly is a dysfunctional family. So Yes; Bill O’Reilly, –you are a “PINHEAD,” extraordinare!
(PS: I am flabergasted at “Justice With Judge Jeanine.” How can a REAL Judge get away with the way she is publicly behaving about this trial? It seems to me like she should be disbarred! I never saw a Judge behave so crazily, so wild and frenzied, disregarding and degrading the jurors, and our justice system. She comes across like a wild beast with rabies, foaming at the mouth, with blood in her eyes, on the attack! It is really HARD to WATCH, and makes me a little sick.) (gasp) –What if SHE had been the actual judge assigned to the Casey Anthony trial? The thought of that REALLY makes me sick.)
Thank God, we still have Greta, and Geraldo.
Posts
